• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • MarketPlace
  • CJCAT
    • From the President
    • From the General Counsel
    • North and East Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • South Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • West Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • Commissioners Court Conference Calendar
  • Conferences
  • Texas County Directory
    • Browse Directory
  • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Meet Our Team
    • Subscribe
    • Previous Issues
      • 2023 Previous Issues
      • 2022 Previous Issues
      • 2021 Previous Issues
      • 2020 Previous Issues
      • 2019 Previous Issues
      • 2018 Previous Issues
      • 2017 Previous Issues
      • 2016 Previous Issues
      • 2015 Previous Issues
      • 2014 Previous Issues
  • Home
  • Legislature
  • Monuments of Justice
  • Key Concept
  • Commissioners Court
  • Texas Counties
  • Obituaries
Texas County Progress

Texas County Progress

The Official Publication of the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas

Traps for the Unwary – Nepotism

September 6, 2024 by Julie Anderson

Continuing our series of columns on traps for the unwary, this month we will discuss the Nepotism Prohibition in Chapter 573, Government Code. Since 1907, this statute has applied to all public officials of this State and its political subdivisions, including members of Commissioners Courts.

Appointment and Confirmation. The statute prohibits a public official from appointing or confirming the appointment of a person within the prohibited relationship to a position that is directly or indirectly compensated from public funds. Under Section 573.041, this prohibition applies to all of the members of a board if the person is related to any member of the board, even if the related member does not participate in the decision. This means that the Commissioners Court cannot vote to appoint a prohibited relative of the Judge or another Commissioner, even if the related member is not present or abstains. See AG Opinion O-3016 (1941). In this case, all members who vote to employ the relative of another member will violate the statute.

Compensated Position. The statute applies to compensated positions paid from public funds. Therefore, the prohibition does not apply to unpaid positions or to persons employed by a private contractor with the county. See AG Opinion C-653 (1966). However, other statutes may apply to contracts with entities owned by members of the Commissioners Court.

Authority to Hire or Appoint. The statute applies to persons with the authority to hire and not otherwise. Therefore, since Commissioners Court is prohibited from influencing the appointment of deputies by other elected officials under Section 151.004, Local Government Code, those officials with independent hiring authority may hire a relative of a member of the Commissioners Court. See AG Opinion 0-4895 (1942) and AG Opinion KP-0045 (2015). However, Section 573.044 specifically prohibits “trading” such appointments or hiring by agreement between officials.

Continuous Employment. Section 573.062 permits the continued employment of a prohibited relative with sufficient prior service when the related official takes office. However, the prohibited relative cannot receive any promotion or salary increase except “across-the-board” increases. See AG Opinion MW-135 (1980).

Degree of Relationship. Under Section 573.002, the statute applies to relationships within the third degree of consanguinity (blood) or within the second degree by affinity (marriage). Subsequent sections provide instruction on the computation of these degrees of relationship, and several opinions and court decisions have been the subject of this question. Section 573.061 contains an exception for appointment of election clerks who are not related within the first degree of consanguinity or affinity. Whenever any question arises about a relationship to a member of the Commissioners Court, a legal opinion should be obtained to avoid an accidental violation.

Penalties. Under Subchapter E, Chapter 573, the penalties for violation of the nepotism statute are severe and include (1) removal from office and (2) a fine between $100 and $1,000. Clearly, the members of the Commissioners Court should obtain legal advice and proceed carefully whenever considering the appointment or hire of any relative of a member of the Commissioners Court.

 

Filed Under: Feature Story, From the General Counsel Tagged With: Nepotism

Perdue Brandon Fielder Collins & Mott LLP
Austin, TX, 78731
800-290-8391
www.pbfcm.com/
CSG Forte
Fort Worth, TX, 76106
8662905400
www.forte.net/
McCreary, Veselka, Bragg & Allen, P.C.
Round Rock, TX , 78680
800-369-9000
mvbalaw.com/
Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP
Austin, TX, 78746
512-472-8023

Primary Sidebar

Search County Progress

May 2025

May 2025

County Progress May 2025 Issue

If you'd like to view our previous issues, click here.

Commissioners Court Meeting Decorum

Sample Rules of Procedure, Conduct, and Decorum at Meetings of the County Commissioners Court

Resolutions

Unfunded Mandate Resolution

The latest resolutions passed by the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas and the three Regional Associations are available at the links below.

County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas Resolutions 2024

North & East Texas Resolutions 2024 

South Texas Resolutions 2024

West Texas Resolutions 2025

 

Subscribe to County Progress

Subscribe: Newsletter | Magazine | Directory

Connect with us online.

Facebook spacer Twitter spacer LinkedIn spacer Instagram

Footer

Search County Progress

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

County Progress

3457 Curry Lane
Abilene, TX 79606
325.673.4822
countyprogress@zacpubs.com

Categories

© 2025 · Zachry Publications

Cart
  • Your cart is empty! Return to shop
Checkout - $0.00
  • 0
  • 1