• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • MarketPlace
  • CJCAT
    • From the President
    • From the General Counsel
    • North and East Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • South Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • West Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • Commissioners Court Conference Calendar
  • Conferences
  • Texas County Directory
    • Buy Subscription
    • Login
    • Browse Directory
  • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Meet Our Team
    • Subscribe
    • Previous Issues
      • 2023 Previous Issues
      • 2022 Previous Issues
      • 2021 Previous Issues
      • 2020 Previous Issues
      • 2019 Previous Issues
      • 2018 Previous Issues
      • 2017 Previous Issues
      • 2016 Previous Issues
      • 2015 Previous Issues
      • 2014 Previous Issues
  • Home
  • Legislature
  • Monuments of Justice
  • Key Concept
  • Commissioners Court
  • Texas Counties
  • Obituaries
Texas County Progress

Texas County Progress

The Official Publication of the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas

Attorney General’s Opinions

December 1, 2010 by Sarah L

Judges Serving on Juvenile Board

            Re: Compensation of judges serving on a juvenile board (RQ-0861-GA).

Submitted by R. Kelton Conner

Hood County Attorney

            Summary, Opinion No. GA-799: Pursuant to section 152.0034(b) of the Human Resources Code, the Hood County Commissioners Court has the authority to establish, increase, decrease, or eliminate the compensation paid to the judges serving on the Hood County Juvenile Board.

 

Appraisals of Hurricane-Damaged Property

            Re: Proper method of appraising the value of residence homesteads damaged by Hurricane Ike in 2008 (RQ-0851-GA).

Submitted by Kurt Sistrunk

Galveston County Criminal District Attorney

            Summary, Opinion No. GA-805: Calculation of the 2010 appraised value of a residence homestead damaged by Hurricane Ike in 2008 and renovated to its pre-storm status is determined by section 23.23(f) of the Tax Code so long as the structure was "rendered uninhabitable or unusable." If the structure was not rendered uninhabitable or unusable, calculation of the 2010 appraised value is dependent upon whether the renovations may reasonably be said to constitute a mere "repair" or a "new improvement" under section 23.23(e). If the structure was rendered uninhabitable or unusable, calculation of the 2010 appraised value is dependent upon the appraised value the property would have had in 2009 but for the storm damage, together with the market value of all new improvements to the property as described by subdivision (f)(2).

 

Commissioners Court, Traffic Regulation

            Re: Authority of a commissioners court to regulate traffic on roads located in an unincorporated area of the county but within the boundaries of a fresh water supply district (RQ-0876-GA).

Submitted by Paul Johnson

Denton County Criminal District Attorney

            Summary, Opinion No. GA-809: The Denton County Commissioners Court likely has no authority under Transportation Code section 251.016 to post speed limits, provide restricted traffic areas for school zones, install traffic control devices, and impose parking restrictions on non-county maintained public roads in subdivisions located within a fresh water supply district in an unincorporated area of Denton County. A court could, however, conclude otherwise. The Denton County Commissioners Court has no authority under Transportation Code sections 251.151, 251.154, 251.155, 251.156, and 542.007 to post speed limits, provide restricted traffic areas for school zones, install traffic control devices, and impose parking restrictions on non-county maintained public roads in subdivisions located within a fresh water supply district in an unincorporated area of Denton County. A fresh water supply district has no authority under Water Code chapters 49 and 53 to post speed limits, provide restricted traffic areas for school zones, install traffic control devices, and impose parking restrictions on non-county maintained public roads in subdivisions located within the district in an unincorporated area of Denton County.

 

Professional Fee Exemption

            Re: Application of the fee exemption for certain certified public accountants who are employees of governmental entities (RQ-0881-GA).

 Submitted by Mr. William Treacy

 Executive Director

 Texas State Board of Public Accountancy

            Summary, Opinion No. GA-811: Because the Brazos River Authority (the "River Authority") is, in its enabling legislation, designated a municipality, we believe a court would conclude that the River Authority is a municipal government for purposes of Occupations Code subsection 901.410(1). Accordingly, an employee of the River Authority who holds a license under the Texas Public Accountancy Act and otherwise qualifies for the exemption is exempt from the professional fees imposed under Occupations Code sections 901.406 and 901.407.

 

Jail Commissary Revenue

            Re: Whether revenue from the sale of prepaid phone cards in a county jail commissary should be credited to the sheriff or to the general fund of the county (RQ-0867-GA).

Submitted by Scott Brumley

Potter County Attorney

            Summary, Opinion No. GA-814:

Revenue from the sale of prepaid phone cards in the county jail commissary should be credited to the sheriff for the use of county jail inmates rather than to the general fund of the county.

 

Court’s Authority to Retain Independent Counsel

            Re: Authority of the Dallas County Commissioners Court to retain independent legal counsel in particular circumstances (RQ-0870-GA).

Submitted by Florence Shapiro

Chair, Committee on Education

Texas State Senate

           

Submitted by Virginia Porter

Dallas County Auditor

            Summary, Opinion No. GA-816: Although the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney has broad authority over most criminal matters and a duty to represent the state in those matters in Dallas County, he does not have a duty to represent Dallas County in all civil matters. However, the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney does have the power to select counsel and to determine the terms and duration of the engagement where the representation will include filing or defending a suit by or against the County. While the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney is not barred from exercising this or any other power on account of his status as a state prosecutor under the statutory provision defining and constraining that office, he is subject to ethical rules governing conflicts of interest that could preclude him from selecting counsel. Whether such a conflict exists is a matter for the Criminal District Attorney and the County Commissioners to determine in the first instance and, barring agreement, as an ancillary matter for the civil court.

Filed Under: Attorney General's Opinions

Primary Sidebar

Search County Progress

May 2025

May 2025

County Progress May 2025 Issue

If you'd like to view our previous issues, click here.

Commissioners Court Meeting Decorum

Sample Rules of Procedure, Conduct, and Decorum at Meetings of the County Commissioners Court

Resolutions

Unfunded Mandate Resolution

The latest resolutions passed by the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas and the three Regional Associations are available at the links below.

County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas Resolutions 2024

North & East Texas Resolutions 2024 

South Texas Resolutions 2024

West Texas Resolutions 2025

 

Subscribe to County Progress

Subscribe: Newsletter | Magazine | Directory

Connect with us online.

Facebook spacer Twitter spacer LinkedIn spacer Instagram

Footer

Search County Progress

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

County Progress

3457 Curry Lane
Abilene, TX 79606
325.673.4822
countyprogress@zacpubs.com

Categories

© 2025 · Zachry Publications

Cart
  • Your cart is empty! Return to shop
Checkout - $0.00
  • 0
  • 1