• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • MarketPlace
  • CJCAT
    • From the President
    • From the General Counsel
    • North and East Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • South Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • West Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • Commissioners Court Conference Calendar
  • Conferences
  • Texas County Directory
    • Buy Subscription
    • Login
    • Browse Directory
  • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Meet Our Team
    • Subscribe
    • Previous Issues
      • 2023 Previous Issues
      • 2022 Previous Issues
      • 2021 Previous Issues
      • 2020 Previous Issues
      • 2019 Previous Issues
      • 2018 Previous Issues
      • 2017 Previous Issues
      • 2016 Previous Issues
      • 2015 Previous Issues
      • 2014 Previous Issues
  • Home
  • Legislature
  • Monuments of Justice
  • Key Concept
  • Commissioners Court
  • Texas Counties
  • Obituaries
Texas County Progress

Texas County Progress

The Official Publication of the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas

Anatomy of an Unfunded Mandate

August 30, 2005 by Sarah L

An unfunded mandate is a requirement imposed upon counties without an appropriation by the state. The primary legislative objective of the State Association is the prevention of unfunded mandates. Legislators have an unending supply of “good ideas” without funding. Every session, we successfully defeat numerous bills with proposed unfunded mandates. Despite our efforts, some unfunded mandates are enacted. Sometimes, powerful interests overcome our efforts in a direct confrontation. More often, unfunded mandates are attached to other important bills by a particular legislator to avoid a clear vote on the mandate.
During the past legislative session, Gov. Perry declared that reform of Child Protective Services was an emergency item. Sen. Jane Nelson, chair of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee, and Rep. Suzanna Hupp, chair of the House Human Services Committee, introduced legislation to substantially revise the services provided to abused and neglected children. Aware that such bills provide an opportunity to hide unfunded mandates in a large bill, we monitored these bills closely.
The leadership decided to utilize Senate Bill 6 by Sen. Nelson as the reform vehicle. The Senate considered it on March 2, 2005. After 19 floor amendments were adopted, it passed the Senate by a vote of 30-0. SB6 went to the House of Representatives with 227 pages, but no unfunded mandates.
In the House, the Human Services Committee produced a substitute containing 140 pages and no unfunded mandates. However, on the House floor, 52 floor amendments were added. Floor Amendment No. 3 by House sponsor Rep. Hupp requires counties to provide an attorney to represent indigent parents in CPS cases requesting temporary managing conservatorship of a child. To fund this mandate, the amendment included a new $15 fee on marriage licenses. While no estimate was provided on either the new costs or the revenue projected from the fee, arguably this was a funded mandate. The House version passed by a vote of 135-6 on April 20, 2005.
With substantial differences between the Senate version and the House version, the Senate refused the House version, and SB6 went to a conference committee of five senators and five representatives, chaired by Sen. Nelson and Rep. Hupp. In the conference committee with no public hearing, SB6 was revised to its final form and returned to the House and Senate at 257 pages. While the mandate to provide attorneys for indigent parents in CPS cases remained in the final version, the marriage license fee was omitted. Since conference committee reports cannot be amended, the Senate and the House adopted the final version on May 29, 2005, by votes of 31-0 and 124-20, respectively. Gov. Perry signed SB6 on June 6, 2005, with an effective date of Sept. 1, 2005.
The provision to mandate attorneys for indigent parents in CPS cases was never subjected to a public hearing. The deletion of the proposed marriage license fee was never discussed in a public meeting. This multimillion dollar unfunded mandate was hidden inside a major bill that had strong leadership support. This was not accidental.
The State Association has requested that Gov. Perry, Sen. Nelson and Rep. Hupp repeal this unfunded mandate. We have received no response at this time. As counties are forced to increase property taxes to fund this mandate, please let your taxpayers know how this occurred.
For more information, please call me at 1-800-733-0699.
Jim Allison, General Counsel CJCAT

Filed Under: From the General Counsel

Primary Sidebar

Search County Progress

May 2025

May 2025

County Progress May 2025 Issue

If you'd like to view our previous issues, click here.

Commissioners Court Meeting Decorum

Sample Rules of Procedure, Conduct, and Decorum at Meetings of the County Commissioners Court

Resolutions

Unfunded Mandate Resolution

The latest resolutions passed by the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas and the three Regional Associations are available at the links below.

County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas Resolutions 2024

North & East Texas Resolutions 2024 

South Texas Resolutions 2024

West Texas Resolutions 2025

 

Subscribe to County Progress

Subscribe: Newsletter | Magazine | Directory

Connect with us online.

Facebook spacer Twitter spacer LinkedIn spacer Instagram

Footer

Search County Progress

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

County Progress

3457 Curry Lane
Abilene, TX 79606
325.673.4822
countyprogress@zacpubs.com

Categories

© 2025 · Zachry Publications

Cart
  • Your cart is empty! Return to shop
Checkout - $0.00
  • 0
  • 1