• Home
  • CJCAT
    • North and East Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • South Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
    • West Texas County Judges and Commissioners Association
  • Conferences
    • Conference Galleries
    • Conference Close-Up
  • Texas County Directory
  • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Submissions
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Previous Issues
      • 2019 Previous Issues
      • 2018 Previous Issues
      • 2017 Previous Issues
      • 2016 Previous Issues
      • 2015 Previous Issues
      • 2014 Previous Issues

Texas County Progress

The Official Publication of the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas

  • Home
    • Feature Story
  • Monuments of Justice
    • Why Stop In
  • Emergency Response
  • Road & Bridge
  • Jails
  • County Focus
  • Veterans

HAVA Grants

September 6, 2004 by admin

Help America Vote Act

Counties Begin to Receive Monies for Compliance

 

Federal monies available through the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), signed into law in 2002, have begun to trickle down to counties. Funding is administered by the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, with $84 million, including a state match of $3 million, earmarked for use by the state and counties.

The first monies available are to reimburse counties that replace punch card or lever voting systems, with the mandate that they do not use those systems as of Jan.1, 2006. Seventeen counties in Texas are eligible to receive about $3,200 per precinct for replacement.

Chambers County was the first to receive reimbursement. The county received $44,700 for direct recording electronic voting systems purchased for 14 precincts in September 2002. The county spent some $350,000 on the new equipment. The county is eligible for another $66,505 in grant funding that can be used for voting equipment purchases or upgrades. Per HAVA, the county can be reimbursed retroactively for the purchases that already have been made.

Jimmy Sylvia, Chambers County judge, said the county wasn’t dependent on the HAVA funds to purchase their system, but receiving the reimbursement was helpful. He said the county now is looking into other grants.

To receive its money, Chambers County used an online process through the secretary of state’s office.

            Jerry Sparks, Chambers County auditor, said the process went smoothly and quickly. Overall, he estimated the process took less than a month to complete.

Chambers County served as a test county for the online system, and Sparks said they only discovered a couple of tweaks that needed to be worked out or clarified.

Dan Glotzer, grant manager for the secretary of state’s office, said this is the first time the office has received grant money, so staff are in the process of building the system.

The process requires a county commissioners court to pass a resolution to seek the reimbursement and requires a county to sign an agreement with the secretary of state’s office. Once those tasks are complete and approved, a county will receive a password to go online to fill out an application for funding.

A county also will receive another password for its financial officer. Once an application is processed, money will be direct deposited into a county account.

At press time, other counties were beginning to request reimbursement. Brazos County, for example, was in the initial stages.

Karen McQueen, county clerk for Brazos County, said the county is seeking more than $300,000 for replacement of a punch card system used in 105 precincts.

Randy Sims, Brazos County judge, said the county was disappointed that the reimbursement amount went down from what originally was promised by Congress.

The Help America Vote Act authorized a total of $3.9 billion for various election reforms over three fiscal years, including $2.16 billion for 2003, Glotzer said. Congress actually appropriated $1.5 billion for 2003 – a level of only about 70 percent of the original authorization.  Congress appropriated just under another $1.5 million for 2004.

“We stepped up and purchased a new system (nearly $800,000),” he said, “assuming we were going to receive full reimbursement.” Sims went on to say the county has been pleased with its new system, particularly in the way it has streamlined vote counting.

 

HAVA Funding Streams

The Texas HAVA State Plan divides total funding into 15 purpose areas, available through four sections of HAVA.

Funding to counties falls into five areas:

  1. Punch card and lever replacement: Monies available to the 17 counties that used a punch card or lever system during the general election for federal office in November 2000.
  2. County education fund: Reimbursement for costs incurred for attending professional election training. These funds may be incurred by the elections administrator’s office, if a county has one, or the county clerk’s and voter registrar’s offices. Counties are reimbursed a certain amount based on voter-age population.
  3. Accessible voting system in each polling place: Funding to reimburse counties for purchasing a HAVA-compliant accessible voting system for each polling location no later than Jan. 1, 2006. Counties can receive $3,000 per precinct used during the November 2000 election.
  4. General HAVA compliance: Voter education, election worker education, and upgraded voting systems to comply with new federal standards are eligible for these funds calculated by county based on voting age population. Minimum reimbursement is $5,000 per county.
  5. County compatibility with statewide voter registration system: These funds will be available at a later date for replacing or upgrading software and equipment that is compatible with the HAVA-required voter registration system.

 

Congress has allotted another $100 million in HAVA funds for Texas during 2004.

Ann McGeehan, director of elections for the secretary of state’s office, said a couple of things are needed for the state to access the money. The HAVA Advisory Committee will reconvene this fall, she said, to file a new state plan and determine how to fund the needed 5 percent state match.

McGeehan said the funds from 2003 federal appropriations were not enough to have accessible polling places statewide.

In preparation for more monies to become available, Glotzer encouraged counties to identify items for which they want to seek reimbursement based on the designated purpose areas, and plan their budgets accordingly. Another preparatory step, he said, is to brief their commissioners courts on the available funding.

As the grant program continues to evolve, Glotzer said counties can expect to receive more information about guidelines and procedures. To find out more, visit the secretary of state’s Web site at www.sos.state.tx.us.

Filed Under: Feature Story Tagged With: funding, Grants, voting

Subscribe to County Progress

Subscribe: Newsletter | Magazine

April 2021

April 2021
If you'd like to view our previous issues, click here.

Diversifying Revenues

Presentation by Tarrant County Judge Glen Whitley

Search County Progress

Texas County Progress Courthouse Primer

County Courthouse Primer

The latest resolutions passed by the County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas and the three Regional Associations are available at the links below.

County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas Resolutions 2020

South Texas Resolutions 2020

West Texas Resolutions 2020

North & East Texas Resolutions 2020

Opposition to SB 234/HB 749 Sample Resolution

The Cost of County Government: 2020 Unfunded Mandates Survey Report

Texas County Directory

Place your order for the updated 2021 Directory

Connect with us online.

Facebook spacer Twitter spacer LinkedIn

Search County Progress

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Print Friendly and PDF

County Progress

3457 Curry Lane
Abilene, TX 79606
325.673.4822
countyprogress@zacpubs.com

Categories

© 2021 · Zachry Publications